Real-World Survival, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Among U.S. Elderly Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Treated With R-GemOx in the Relapsed/Refractory Setting.

BACKGROUND: Little recent real-world evidence exists on overall survival, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs among R/R DLBCL patients treated with the combination of rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx), a widely-used regimen for patients ineligible for stem cell transplant due to age or comorbidities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis used 2014 to 2019 U.S. Medicare claims. Individuals aged ≥66 years with a new DLBCL diagnosis between October 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 and continuous fee-for-service Medicare Part A, B, and D coverage in the 12 months pre- and postindex were followed to identify the sample of patients with evidence of R-GemOx treatment in the second-line (2L) or third-line (3L) setting. Outcomes included overall survival, all-cause and DLBCL-related HCRU, and costs after R-GemOx initiation. RESULTS: The final sample included 157 patients who received treatment with R-GemOx in the R/R settings (mean (SD) age 77.5 (6.0) years, 39.5% age>80 years; 66.9% male; 91.1% White). Of these, 126 received R-GemOx in the 2L setting and 31 received R-GemOx in the 3L setting. Median overall survival from R-GemOx initiation was 6.9 months and 6.8 months in the 2L and 3L setting, respectively. Rates of all-cause hospitalization (68.1% [2L] and >90% [3L]) and hospice use (42.9% [2L] and 51.7% [3L]) were high in the 12 months after R-GemOx initiation. All-cause total costs were substantial ($144,653 [2L] and $142,812 [3L]) and approximately 80% of costs were DLBCL-related within 12 months of R-GemOx initiation. CONCLUSION: Elderly U.S. Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with DLBCL who initiated R-GemOx treatment in the R/R setting have poor overall survival, high rates of HCRU, and substantial costs.

Real-world treatment patterns, survival, health resource use and costs among Medicare beneficiaries with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Aim: To examine real-world treatment patterns, survival, healthcare resource use and costs in elderly Medicare beneficiaries with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods: 11,880 Medicare patients aged ≥66 years with DLBCL between 1 October 2015 and 31 December 2018 were followed for ≥12 months after initiating front-line treatment. Results: Two-thirds (61.2%) of the patients received standard-of-care R-CHOP as first-line treatment. Hospitalization was common (57%) in the 12-months after initiation of 1L treatment; the mean DLCBL-related total costs were US$84,416 during the same period. Over a median follow-up of 2.1 years, 17.8% received at least 2L treatment. Overall survival was lower among later lines of treatment (median overall survival from initiation of 1L: not reached; 2L: 19.9 months; 3L: 9.8 months; 4L: 5.5 months). Conclusion: A large unmet need exists for more efficacious and well-tolerated therapies for older adults with DLBCL.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and it becomes more common with age. While researchers continue to develop newer, more effective treatments for DLBCL, it is important to understand how patients use existing treatments and the associated costs, particularly among the elderly. In our real-world analysis of nearly 12,000 older patients with DLBCL, we found high rates of hospitalization and hospice use, short length of life in later lines of therapy and substantial healthcare costs. Our findings suggest a large current unmet need for more effective and well-tolerated therapies for older adults with DLBCL in both the front-line and relapse/refractory settings.

Assessing unmet need among elderly Medicare Beneficiaries with Mantle cell lymphoma: an analysis of treatment patterns, survival, healthcare resource utilization, and costs.

Studies evaluating real-world outcomes and health care utilization for mantle cell lymphoma are limited. We utilized national Medicare claims (2009-2019) to examine treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, costs, and survival in 3664 elderly patients receiving 1 L treatment for MCL. Over a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 40.3% received at least 2 L treatment. The most common 1 L regimen was bendamustine-rituximab (50.1%), with increased use of BTKi-based regimens observed in 2 L (39.4%). Half (51.8%) of patients had an all-cause hospitalization within 12 months of initiating 1 L; hospitalization rates were higher in later lines. Healthcare costs were substantial and most costs (>80%) were MCL-related. Overall survival was poorer among later lines of treatment (median OS from initiation of 1 L: 53.5 months; 2 L: 22.0 months; 3 L: 11.8 months; 4 L: 7.8 months). These results suggest a large unmet need and future work should evaluate whether novel therapies have improved outcomes among elderly patients with MCL.

A systematic literature review of the epidemiology, quality of life, and economic burden, including disease pathways and treatment patterns of relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: A systematic literature review was conducted to understand disease burden in patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL). AREAS COVERED: Embase®, PubMed®, and Cochrane were searched for records from 2001 to 2020 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 13,257 abstracts and 1731 papers were screened; 144 studies were identified. cHL accounted for 0.5% of all cancers, with 4‒66.7% of cases progressing to R/R disease (studies with >500 patients); this range varied across countries. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed via EORTC-QLQ-C30 (n = 7), EQ-5D (n = 5), SF-36 (n = 3), FACIT-F (n = 1), and MFI (n = 1) questionnaires. In general, pembrolizumab and other programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors improved QoL scores. Brentuximab vedotin showed mixed outcomes, and high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem-cell rescue (ASCR) showed worsening functionality/symptoms. Economic burden studies (n = 21) reported increased costs and health care resource in R/R cHL. Across clinical guidelines (n = 13) and treatment pattern studies (n = 46), HDT followed by ASCR was recommended as initial R/R cHL treatment. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab were frequently recommended for patients relapsing following HDT/ASCR. EXPERT OPINION: Despite recent treatment advances, patients with R/R cHL continue to report reduced quality of life. Unmet medical needs remain, particularly with respect to slowing disease progression and identifying the best treatment approaches for improving longer-term survival and quality of life. This systematic literature review provides an extensive overview of the current landscape in patients with R/R cHL, focusing on four key areas: epidemiology, QoL, economic burden, and disease management. These findings will be useful to those with an interest in managing patients with R/R cHL or in designing future studies.

Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs of patients diagnosed with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma in the United States.

AIMS: With the advent of ICD-10-CM codes for PMBCL on 10/01/2015, assessment of treatment patterns and healthcare burden among US patients is possible. This study sought to describe the real-world treatment patterns and economic outcomes of patients with PMBCL. METHODS: Data from the Optum Clinformatics DataMart database was used (January 2013-March 2018). Patients with a first PMBCL ICD-10-CM diagnosis (with or without an antecedent ICD-10-CM diagnosis of DLBCL/other lymphoma, which may have been assigned before PMBCL confirmation) after 10/01/2015 (index date) and no ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for unspecified PMBCL/DLBCL were identified as incident patients. Those with PMBCL ICD-10-CM and unspecified ICD-9-CM diagnosis for PMBCL/DLBCL before 10/01/2015 (index date) were identified as prevalent patients. Patients were observed from the index date up to the earliest among death, end of data availability, or end of continuous health plan enrollment. An adapted algorithm was used to identify lines of therapy (LOT). RESULTS: Among 118 incident and 30 prevalent PMBCL patients, 14% and 20% of patients received ≥2 LOTs, respectively. In incident patients, 48% received ≥1 LOT, 14% ≥2, and 4% ≥3 LOTs. Among prevalent patients, 63% received ≥1 LOT and 20% ≥2 LOTs. The most frequently recorded 1 L therapy was R-CHOP both among incident and prevalent patients. Mean total healthcare costs for incident and prevalent patients were $149,340 and $92,799 per patient per year, respectively, with higher costs ≤12 months ($187,241 and $167,553). Outpatient costs were the main driver (accounting for 60.5% and 64.6% for incident and prevalent patients, respectively). LIMITATIONS: Potential underuse of ICD-10-CM codes shortly after discontinuation of ICD-9-CM codes in 01/2015; regimens identified for each LOT using the claims-based algorithm may not reflect the regimen administered. CONCLUSION: The multiple LOTs necessary for a sizeable minority of patients and the high costs of care highlight the significant unmet needs of PMBCL patients.

Real-World Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, Health Care Resource Use, and Costs of Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the U.S.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the U.S., but current real-world data are limited. This study was conducted to describe real-world characteristics, treatment patterns, health care resource utilization (HRU), and health care costs of patients with treated DLBCL in the U.S. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database (January 2013 to March 2018). Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis for DLBCL after October 2015 and no prior International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis for unspecified DLBCL or primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma were classified as incident; those with such codes were classified as prevalent. An adapted algorithm identified lines of therapy (e.g., first line [1L]). All-cause HRU and costs were calculated per-patient-per-year (PPPY) among patients with a ≥1L. RESULTS: Among 1,877 incident and 651 prevalent patients with ≥1L, median age was 72 years and 46% were female. Among incident patients, 22.6% had at least two lines (2L), whereas 38.4% of prevalent patients had ≥2L. The most frequent 1L therapy was rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Incident patients had 1.3 inpatient and 42.0 outpatient (OP) visits PPPY, whereas prevalent patients had 0.8 and 31.3 visits PPPY, respectively. Total costs were $137,156 and $81,669 PPPY for incident and prevalent patients, respectively. OP costs were the main driver of total costs at $88,202 PPPY, which were higher within the first year. CONCLUSION: This study showed that a large portion of patients require additional therapy after 1L treatment to manage DLBCL and highlighted the substantial economic burden of patients with DLBCL, particularly within the first year following diagnosis. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) carry a substantial clinical and economic burden. A large portion of these patients require additional therapy beyond first-line treatment. There is significant unmet need among patients with DLBCL who require additional therapy beyond first-line treatment. Patients who do not respond to first-line therapy and are not eligible for transplants have very high health care resource utilization and costs, especially in the first 12 months following initiation of treatment.

Treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma treated with brentuximab vedotin.

Data are limited on the real-world utilization and costs of brentuximab vedotin (BV) among patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (rrHL) in the United States. A total of 219 BV patients identified from the Truven MarketScan® databases were followed up for a median of 2.9 years before and 1.0 year after initiation of BV. Of these patients, 109 (50.6%) received systemic therapy after BV (post-BV ST). Median duration of treatment was short for BV (2.1 months) and post-BV ST treatment (1.3 months); time to next treatment was 6.2 and 9.1 months, respectively. Average total US dollar 2014 costs/person for BV and post-BV ST line of therapy were $167,152 and $132,115, respectively; mean per-patient-per-month costs for BV and post-BV ST were $30,434 and $29,138, respectively. Findings underscore the unmet medical need and substantial economic burden in BV-treated patients with rrHL.

Costs of hospital visits among patients with deep vein thrombosis treated with rivaroxaban and LMWH/warfarin.

BACKGROUND: For many years, the standard of care for patients diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) bridging to an oral Vitamin-K antagonist (VKA). The availability of new non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOAC) agents as monotherapy may reduce the likelihood of hospitalization for DVT patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare hospital visit costs of DVT patients treated with rivaroxaban and LMWH/warfarin. METHODS: A retrospective claim analysis was conducted using the MarketScan Hospital Drug Database for care provided between January 2011 and December 2013. Adult patients using rivaroxaban or LMWH/warfarin with a primary diagnosis of DVT during the first day of a hospital visit were identified (i.e., index hospital visit). Based on propensity-score methods, historical LMWH/warfarin patients (i.e., patients who received LMWH/warfarin before the approval of rivaroxaban) were matched 4:1 to rivaroxaban patients. The hospital-visit cost difference between these groups was evaluated for the index hospital visit, as well as for total hospital-visit costs (i.e., including index and subsequent hospital visit costs). RESULTS: All rivaroxaban users (n = 134) in the database were well-matched with four LMWH/warfarin users (n = 536). The mean hospital-visit costs were $5257 for the rivaroxaban cohort and $6764 in the matched-cohort of patients using LMWH/warfarin. The $1508 cost difference was statistically significant between cohorts (95% CI = [-$2296; -$580]; p-value = 0.002). Total hospital-visit costs were lower for rivaroxaban compared to LMWH/warfarin users within 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after index visit (significantly lower within 1 and 3 months, p-values <0.05) LIMITATIONS: Limitations were inherent to administrative-claims data, completeness of baseline characteristics, adjustments restricted to observational factors, and lastly the sample size of the rivaroxaban cohort. CONCLUSION: The availability of rivaroxaban significantly reduced the costs of hospital visits in patients with DVT treated with rivaroxaban compared to LMWH/warfarin.

Hidden costs associated with venous thromboembolism: impact of lost productivity on employers and employees.

OBJECTIVE: To determine productivity loss and indirect costs with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: Medical and pharmacy claims with short-term disability (STD) and long-term disability (LTD) claims from 2007 to 2010 were analyzed from the Integrated Benefits Institute's Health and Productivity Benchmarking (IBI-HPB) database (STD and LTD claims) and IMS LifeLink™ data (medical and pharmacy claims), which were indirectly linked using a weighting approach matching from IBI-HPB patients' demographic distribution. RESULTS: A total of 5442 DVT and 6199 PE claims were identified. Employees with DVT lost 57 STD and 440 LTD days per disability incident. The average per claim productivity loss from STD and LTD was $7414 and $58181, respectively. Employees with PE lost 56 STD and 364 LTD days per disability incident. The average per claim productivity loss from STD and LTD was $7605 and $48,751, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Deep vein thrombosis and PE impose substantial economic burdens.

Is rivaroxaban associated with lower inpatient costs compared to warfarin among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?

BACKGROUND: Warfarin has been the mainstay treatment used by patients with a moderate-to-high risk of stroke due to non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Unlike rivaroxaban, laboratory monitoring to allow the attainment of the prothrombin time international normalized ratio goal is required with warfarin, thereby potentially increasing a patient's hospitalization costs. OBJECTIVE: To compare hospitalization costs between hospitalized NVAF patients using rivaroxaban versus warfarin in a real-world setting. METHODS: A retrospective claims analysis was conducted using the Premier Perspective Comparative Hospital Database from November 2010 to September 2012. The study included adult patients hospitalized for NVAF after November 2011. Patients using rivaroxaban during hospitalization were matched with up to four warfarin users by propensity score analyses. Hospitalization costs were compared between the matched cohorts using generalized estimating equations. A sub-analysis was performed for patients who were first administered their treatment on day three or later of their hospital stay. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on matched cohorts with a primary diagnosis of AF. RESULTS: The matched cohorts' (2809 rivaroxaban and 11,085 warfarin users) characteristics were well balanced. The mean age of cohorts was 71 years and 49% of patients were female. The average hospitalization cost of rivaroxaban users was $11,993 compared to $13,255 for warfarin users. The cost difference was significantly lower by $1284 (P < 0.001). Patients who were administered rivaroxaban treatment on day three or after incurred significantly lower hospitalization costs (cost difference: $4350; P < 0.001) compared to warfarin users. Rivaroxaban users with a primary diagnosis of AF also had significantly lower costs compared to warfarin users. LIMITATIONS: These included possible inaccuracies or omissions in diagnoses, completeness of baseline characteristics, and a study population that included patients newly initiated on and patients who continued anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSION: Hospitalization costs for rivaroxaban were significantly lower than those for warfarin in NVAF patients treated with rivaroxaban.

The economic burden of acute coronary syndromes for employees and their dependents: medical and productivity costs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the total burden of illness, including direct and indirect costs for employees and their dependents with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Medical and pharmacy claims along with short-term disability (STD) and long-term disability (LTD) claims from 2007 to 2010 were analyzed using two data sets: Integrated Benefits Institute's Health and Productivity Benchmarking Database (STD and LTD claims) and IMS LifeLink™ Health Plan Data (medical and pharmacy claims). RESULTS: Employees with ACS lost 60.2 ± 0.29 STD and 397.9 ± 8.09 LTD days per disability incident. For employers, the estimated average per claim productivity loss from STD and LTD was $7943 ± 39.7 and $52,473 ± 1114, respectively. Total annual ACS health care costs per employee were $8170 ± 106, with $7545 ± 104 for annual medical costs. Hospitalizations accounted for 75% of total annual ACS health care costs. CONCLUSIONS: ACS imposes a substantial economic burden on employees, employers, and society.

A clinical pathway for community-acquired pneumonia: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Six hospitals instituted a voluntary, system-wide, pathway for community acquired pneumonia (CAP). We proposed this study to determine the impact of pathway antibiotics on patient survival, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospital cost. METHODS: Data were collected for adults from six U.S. hospitals with a principal CAP discharge diagnosis code, a chest infiltrate, and medical notes indicative of CAP from 2005-2007. Pathway and non-pathway cohorts were assigned according to antibiotics received within 48 hours of admission. Pathway antibiotics included levofloxacin 750 mg monotherapy or ceftriaxone 1000 mg plus azithromycin 500 mg daily. Multivariable regression models assessed 90-day mortality, hospital LOS, total hospital cost, and total pharmacy cost. RESULTS: Overall, 792 patients met study criteria. Of these, 505 (64%) received pathway antibiotics and 287 (36%) received non-pathway antibiotics. Adjusted means and p-values were derived from Least Squares regression models that included Pneumonia Severity Index risk class, patient age, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and admitting hospital as covariates. After adjustment, patients who received pathway antibiotics experienced lower adjusted 90-day mortality (p = 0.02), shorter mean hospital LOS (3.9 vs. 5.0 days, p < 0.01), lower mean hospital costs ($2,485 vs. $3,281, p = 0.02), and similar mean pharmacy costs ($356 vs. $442, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Pathway antibiotics were associated with improved patient survival, hospital LOS, and total hospital cost for patients admitted to the hospital with CAP.

Comparative antibiotic failure rates in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: Results from a claims analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic treatment failure contributes to the economic and humanistic burdens of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) by increasing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. This study compared treatment failure rates of levofloxacin with those of other antibiotics in a large US sample. METHODS: Medical and pharmacy claims in the nationally representative SDI database were used to identify adults with a new outpatient diagnosis of CAP receiving a study antibiotic (levofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, azithromycin, moxifloxacin) between September 1, 2005 and March 31, 2008. Treatment failure was defined as ≥1 of the following events ≤30 days after index date: a refill for the index antibiotic after completed days of therapy, a different antibiotic dispensed >1 day after the index prescription, or hospitalization with a pneumonia diagnosis or emergency department visit >3 days postindex. Cohorts were propensity score matched for demographic and clinical characteristics. Treatment failure rates were compared between pairs of cohorts for the full sample and for high-risk patients (age ≥65 and/or on Medicaid). RESULTS: Among the 3994 study patients, the numbers of dispensed index prescriptions were 268 for amoxicillin/clavulanate, 1609 for azithromycin, 1460 for levofloxacin, and 657 for moxifloxacin. Unadjusted treatment failure rates for the sample were 20.8% for levofloxacin, 23.9% for amoxicillin/clavulanate, 23.9% for azithromycin, and 19.9% for moxifloxacin. For high-risk patients, unadjusted treatment failure rates were 19.1% for levofloxacin, 26.1% for amoxicillin/clavulanate, 26.3% for azithromycin, and 24.3% for moxifloxacin. Propensity score-matched treatment failure rates were significantly lower with levofloxacin than azithromycin (19.8% vs. 24.5%, odds ratio [OR] comparator vs. levofloxacin 1.38; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.67), a difference amplified in high-risk patients (19.0% vs. 26.4%, OR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.13). No significant differences were observed for other paired comparisons. CONCLUSION: In a large US sample, treatment failure in CAP appeared to be less likely with quinolones (such as levofloxacin) than azithromycin, an effect particularly marked in high-risk patients (age ≥65 and/or on Medicaid).

Hospital visits and costs following outpatient treatment of CAP with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin.

BACKGROUND: Hospital admissions (inpatient and emergency room) are a major source of medical costs for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) initially treated in the outpatient setting. Current CAP treatment guidelines do not differentiate between outpatient treatment with levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. OBJECTIVE: Compare health care resource use and medical costs to payers for CAP outpatients initiating treatment with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: CAP episodes were identified in the PharMetrics database between 2Q04 and 2Q07 based on: pneumonia diagnosis, chest X-ray and treatment with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. Subsequent 30-day risk of pneumonia-related hospital visits and 30-day health care costs to payers for levofloxacin vs. moxifloxacin treatment were estimated after adjusting for pre-treatment demographics, health care resource use and pneumonia-specific risk factors using propensity score and exact factor matching. RESULTS: A total of 15,472 levofloxacin- and 6474 moxifloxacin-initiated CAP patients were identified. Among 6352 matched pairs, levofloxacin treatment was associated with a 35% reduction in the odds of pneumonia-related hospital visits (odds ratio = 0.65, P = 0.004), lower per-patient costs for pneumonia-related hospital visits (102 dollars vs. 210 dollars, P = 0.001), lower pneumonia-related total costs (medical services and prescription drugs, 363 dollars vs. 491 dollars, P < 0.001) and lower total costs (1308 dollars vs. 1446 dollars, P < 0.001) vs. moxifloxacin over the 30-day observation period. LIMITATIONS: Although observational analyses of claims data provide large sample sizes and reflect routine care, they do have several inherent limitations. Since randomization of subjects is not possible, adequate statistical techniques must be used to ensure that patient characteristics are well-balanced between treatment groups. In addition, data may be missing or miscoded. CONCLUSIONS: CAP outpatients initiated with levofloxacin generated substantially lower costs to payers compared to matched patients initiated with moxifloxacin. The cost savings for patients initiated with levofloxacin were largely attributable to reduced rates of pneumonia-related hospitalization or ER visits.

Economic burden of atopic manifestations in patients with atopic dermatitis--analysis of administrative claims.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) has been associated with atopic manifestations (AMs), such as food allergies, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and allergic conjunctivitis. OBJECTIVES: To (1) compare the risk of developing AMs in patients with AD versus those without AD, (2) estimate the incremental costs attributable to AMs in patients with AD, and (3) examine the factors associated with incremental costs. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the authors used MarketScan research databases containing medical and pharmacy claims with dates of service from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2004. Patients were considered to have AD if they had at least 1 medical claim with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AD (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] codes 691.8x) or contact dermatitis or other eczema of unspecified cause (ICD-9-CM codes 692.9x). To create comparable study cohorts, patients with AD were matched with non-AD patients using propensity scores that represented the likelihood of developing AD as predicted by logistic regression. After propensity score matching, the AD and non-AD cohorts did not statistically differ with respect to age, gender, geographic region, type of health insurance, Charlson Comorbidity Index, or baseline measures of medical and prescription drug utilization. The relative risks of developing AMs in the AD and non-AD cohorts were estimated using competing risk-survival analysis. AM was defined by ICD-9-CM codes for asthma (493.xx), allergic rhinitis (477.xx), allergic conjunctivitis (372.05 or 372.14), and food allergy (693.1x, 692.5x, 995.60). The annual incremental cost attributable to AMs in these AD patients was calculated from medical claims with AM and AD diagnosis codes and from pharmacy claims for prescription drugs used to treat asthma, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, or food allergy, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the bootstrap method. RESULTS: Patients with AD were significantly more likely to develop AMs than patients without AD (21.8% versus 16.9%, adjusted relative risk [RR] = 1.33, 95% CI, 1.28-1.38). Among AD patients who developed AMs, allergic rhinitis was the most frequent manifestation (66.3%), followed by asthma (24.8%), allergic conjunctivitis (7.6%), and food allergy (1.8%). The incidence and adjusted RRs of developing AM for AD patients versus comparison patients were 5.3% versus 4.5% for asthma (RR = 1.20, 95% CI, 1.12-1.29), 14.6% versus 11.2% for allergic rhinitis (RR = 1.35, 95% CI, 1.29-1.41), 1.6% versus 1.1% for allergic conjunctivitis (RR = 1.50, 95% CI, 1.31-1.72), and 0.3% versus 0.1% for food allergy (RR = 2.35, 95% CI, 1.66-3.32). The annual AD + AM treatment costs for patients with AD increased substantially after they developed AMs. The additional financial burden attributable to AMs was estimated to be $482 per year, an almost 1.5-fold increase compared with AD cost alone (from $338 before AM development to $820 afterward, P < 0.001), with approximately equal distribution of costs between medical services ($243) and prescription drugs ($239). The largest incremental costs were observed in asthma ($973), followed by allergic rhinitis ($341). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AD are significantly more likely to develop AM compared with patients without AD. The total treatment costs for AD patients who developed AMs were nearly 2.5 times the total treatment costs for patients with AD alone.

Retrospective study of the effect of skeletal complications on total medical care costs in patients with bone metastases of breast cancer seen in typical clinical practice.

Intravenous bisphosphonates are effective in reducing the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in women with bone metastases of breast cancer. The cost-effectiveness of such therapy depends in part on the potential cost savings achieved by preventing these events. However, estimates of the costs of SREs in women with bone metastases of breast cancer in typical US clinical practice are unavailable. The purpose of this study was to estimate the treatment costs of clinically significant SREs and the impact of these events on total medical care costs in patients with bone metastases of breast cancer. Data were gathered from a large US health insurance claims database. Patients with bone metastases of breast cancer who experienced one or more clinically significant SREs in typical clinical practice were matched to similar patients without SREs based on propensity scores. Kaplan-Meier estimated total medical care costs were compared over 60 months for propensity-matched samples of patients with SREs and without SREs. We identified 617 patients with breast cancer and bone metastases, including 321 (52%) with > or = 1 clinically significant SRE. After matching, there were 201 patients each in the SRE and no-SRE groups, with mean follow-up of 13.8 and 11.0 months, respectively. In the SRE group, costs of treatment of SREs were $13,940 (95% CI, $11,240-$16,856) per patient. Total medical care costs were $48,173 (95% CI, $19,068-$77,684) greater in SRE versus no-SRE patients (P = 0.001). The costs of clinically significant SREs in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases seen in typical clinical practice are substantial. Treatments that reduce the incidence of SREs, such as intravenous bisphosphonates, should reduce these costs.

A survey-based assessment of the prevalence and severity of chronic hand dermatitis in a managed care organization.

Although studies conducted outside of the United States have found a 7% to 12% prevalence of chronic hand dermatitis, no US general population-based estimates have been reported. The objective of this study was to quantify the prevalence of chronic hand dermatitis in a US managed care organization population. A 13-item self-assessment questionnaire was developed and validated, with 85% sensitivity and 95% specificity. The questionnaire was mailed to 2 random member samples from a Massachusetts managed care organization: 502 general members and 878 members with dermatitis. The questionnaire had a 36.74% overall response rate, with a chronic hand dermatitis point prevalence of 17.49% and 33.33% in the general and dermatitis populations, respectively. Among the general population, the questionnaire results identified 16.94% members who had chronic hand dermatitis but had not sought dermatitis-related medical services. After direct standardization to the 2000 US Census population with respect to age, gender, and race distributions, the projected point prevalence was estimated at 16.36% in the US general population. In conclusion, we found a higher prevalence of chronic hand dermatitis than previously reported. Approximately 1 in 6 members did not seek medical attention, suggesting that chronic hand dermatitis may be underdetected and untreated and may require more awareness and effective management.

Impact of skeletal complications on total medical care costs among patients with bone metastases of lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have estimated the costs of skeletal-related events (SREs) for patients with bone metastases of solid tumors by tallying costs for services specifically attributable to these events. This approach may underestimate costs if SREs indirectly increase use of other services. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study using a large health insurance claims database. Patients with bone metastases of lung cancer who experienced > or =1 SRE were matched to similar patients without SREs based on propensity scores. Kaplan-Meier estimated total medical care costs were compared for propensity-matched samples of patients with SREs and without SREs. RESULTS: We identified 534 patients with lung cancer and bone metastases, including 295 (55%) with > or =1 SRE. After matching, there were 162 patients each in the SRE and no-SRE groups with mean follow-up of 5.3 and 3.9 months, respectively. In the SRE group, costs of treatment of SREs were $9,480 (95% CI $7,625 to $11,374) per patient. Total medical care costs were $27,982 (95% CI $15,921 to $40,625) greater for SRE versus no-SRE patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The costs of SREs in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases are substantial and potentially greater than previously estimated.

The cost of treatment of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with bone metastases from lung cancer often experience skeletal-related events (SREs) including pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia or pain requiring surgery, radiotherapy or opioid analgesics. These complications result in impaired mobility and reduced quality of life and have a significant negative impact on survival. The economic consequences of SREs in patients with lung cancer have not been examined. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using a large US health insurance claims database to estimate the incidence and costs of treatment of SREs in patients with bone metastases of lung cancer treated in a naturalistic setting. Study subjects had >/=2 encounters with a diagnosis of primary lung cancer and >/=2 encounters with a diagnosis of metastases to bone. SREs were identified based on the occurrence on or after the date of first diagnosis of bone metastases, of (1) >/=1 encounter with a diagnosis of pathological fracture, spinal cord compression or hypercalcemia, (2) >/=1 bone surgery or radiotherapy procedure, or (3) the initiation of opioid analgesic therapy. Survival and costs of SRE-related care in patients with SREs were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: We identified 534 patients with lung cancer and bone metastases, including 295 (55%) with >/=1 SRE. Radiotherapy (68%) and fracture (35%) were the most common SREs. Median survival after the first identified SRE was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval: 3.6-5.5 months). The estimated lifetime SRE-related cost per patient was USD 11,979 (95% confidence interval: USD 10,193-13,766). Radiotherapy accounted for the greatest proportion of cost (61%) by SRE type. CONCLUSION: The economic burden of SREs in patients with bone metastases of lung cancer is substantial. Intravenous bisphosphonates, such as zoledronic acid, which have been shown to prevent these events, may reduce these costs.